Getting person, payroll, and talent data into Oracle Cloud HCM is mission-critical. Two native options dominate: HDL (HCM Data Loader) and HSDL (HCM Spreadsheet Data Loader). Both are first-class, but they solve different problems. Here’s a practical, no-nonsense guide to pick the right tool—every time.
TL;DR — 60-Second Decision
-
Use HSDL when business users need guided, self-service updates in small–medium volumes with on-screen validation (e.g., 50–5,000 rows).
-
Use HDL for bulk/initial migrations, cross-object loads, automation via OIC/ESS, very large data sets, and repeatable pipelines.
Quick Comparison
| Dimension | HSDL (Spreadsheet Loader) | HDL (File Loader) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary users | HR/Payroll Ops, SMEs | Integration/data teams |
| Volume sweet spot | Low to medium (ops updates) | Medium to very large (tens of thousands+) |
| Speed | Fast for targeted updates | Fastest at scale; parallelizable via ESS |
| Safety & validation | Inline spreadsheet checks, user-friendly errors | Staged Import → Load with detailed logs & rollbacks per object |
| Automation | Limited (interactive) | Excellent: OIC/ESS + UCM pipelines, scheduling, CI-style runs |
| Cross-object complexity | Lower (single BO per sheet typical) | High (multi-BO packages, dependencies, sequence control) |
| Auditability | Good (who/when per submission) | Strong (package-level audit, logs, file retention) |
| Skills needed | Template usage, basic data prep | Staging design, mapping, sequencing, error triage |
| Best for | Recurring ops changes owned by HR/Payroll | Initial loads, mass changes, integrations, country rollouts |
BO = Business Object (Worker, Assignment, Element Entry, Absence, etc.)
When HSDL Wins (Self-Service Ops)
Choose HSDL for:
-
Employee/manager data corrections (emails, phones, addresses, DFFs).
-
Element entries for targeted groups (bonuses, one-time payments).
-
Absence balances/adjustments after audit.
-
Position or job updates in manageable batches.
-
Localizations where HR needs controlled bulk edits with guardrails.
Why it’s safer for ops: HSDL templates expose only the fields you allow, perform inline validation, and reduce mapping mistakes. It’s ideal when business teams “own” the data change.
Pro tips
-
Lock templates to specific BOs and fields; add help text & examples.
-
Enable Validate before Submit; require attachments for auditable changes.
-
Train on effective dating (start/end dates, correction vs. update).
When HDL Wins (Scale, Automation, Complexity)
Choose HDL for:
-
Initial migration of Foundation, Person, Work Structures, Payroll, Benefits.
-
Very large updates (regrades, mass org/position changes, merge & end-date waves).
-
Integrated feeds (ATS to Worker, T&A to Payroll, Benefits vendors, etc.).
-
Country rollouts and multi-object dependencies (Worker → Assignment → Element Entry).
-
Repeatable nightly/weekly loads orchestrated by OIC and scheduled ESS jobs.
Why it’s faster & safer at scale: HDL batches are staged (Import) and then applied (Load), with precise object-level erroring, retry, and sequencing. It’s built for pipelines.
Pro tips
-
Package by BO and country/legal employer to isolate failures.
-
Use MERGE/CREATE/DELETE/END_DATE operations deliberately (avoid unintended overwrites).
-
Keep codes/IDs consistent (Location, Job, Grade, Element) and preload reference data.
-
Design idempotent jobs (safe to re-run). Keep UCM naming conventions for traceability.
-
Always run a mock and dress rehearsal before cutover.
Decision Tree (Simple)
-
Is this initial load or a recurring integration? → HDL
-
Will HR own the change with < 5k records and needs UI validation? → HSDL
-
Multiple BOs with dependencies in one go? → HDL
-
Need headless scheduling, CI/CD, or OIC orchestration? → HDL
-
One BO, narrow fields, business-friendly, auditable via UI? → HSDL
Real-World Scenarios
-
Greenfield Go-Live (single country):
Foundation, Work Structures, Person/Assignment, Payroll elements, Absence plans → HDL.
Post-go-live address clean-up → HSDL. -
Quarterly Merit Cycle (Compensation):
If sourced from HRIS/BI and large → HDL. If small HR-driven corrections → HSDL. -
Vendor Feeds (Benefits, Time, Background Checks):
API/file orchestration & retries → HDL via OIC + ESS. -
Global Email Domain Change:
60,000 workers—batch and re-run capable → HDL. -
Union Allowance for 400 employees:
Scoped element entries with template guardrails → HSDL.
Safety & Compliance Checklist
For both HDL & HSDL
-
Effective dating rules clear (Correct vs. Update vs. End-date).
-
Validate reference data first (LE, BU, Dept, Location, Job, Grade, Element).
-
Pre-load QA/SIT, reconcile with control totals, then promote to PROD.
-
Keep an audit pack: mapping spec, sample files/sheets, run logs, defect list.
HDL-specific
-
Separate Import and Load runs for triage; fix & replay only failing BOs.
-
Maintain package versioning (UCM folders, timestamped names).
-
Monitor ESS logs; alert on failures via OIC/notifications.
HSDL-specific
-
Restrict columns & add field help; hide risky attributes.
-
Use data validations (required, domain values) in template.
-
Control who can submit vs. who can validate/approve (process wise).
Performance Tips
-
Use smaller, logical batches (e.g., 10–25k rows per HDL BO package).
-
Sequence dependent BOs (e.g., Worker before Element Entry).
-
Normalize codes (avoid free text).
-
For HSDL, split workbooks by legal employer/BU to reduce lock contention.
-
Schedule loads off-peak; coordinate with payroll cutoffs and quarterly updates.
Need help designing idempotent HDL pipelines, business-safe HSDL templates, or OIC-orchestrated integrations?
Top Knack Consulting Services can plug in fast—scoping, build, and playbooks included.
📞 +91 90636 60838 • ✉️ hr@topknackconsulting.com
